2017

January 1, 2018

My SmallTrades Portfolio holds stocks and broad-market index ETFs (chart 1).

chart 1. SmallTrades Portfolio in 2017.

Chart 2 shows the diversification of ETFs as measured by percentages of year-end market values among ETF classes.

chart 2. Diversification of ETFs in 2017.

Chart 3 shows the diversification of stocks among 8 market sectors as measured by percentages of year-end market value for each stock sector and the ETFs.

Chart 3. Distribution of stocks and ETFs by market sectors.

Chart 4 shows the distribution of stocks according to market capitalization.

Chart 4. Combined market capitalizations.

Performance

My investment goal is to outperform the “Benchmark” Standard & Poors 500 Total Return Index, yet my portfolio has never outperformed the Benchmark (chart 5).

Chart 5. Portfolio performance.

Chart 5 shows growth trends for the benchmark (blue dashed line) and portfolio (solid blue line) since 2007 [the benchmark represents a passively managed, buy-and-hold investment; my portfolio is an actively managed investment].  On the Y axis, a unit value of $1.00 was assigned to both the total market value of the Portfolio and the Benchmark on December 31, 2007. Ratios of subsequent market- and benchmark values to the 2007 baseline are displayed line plots on the chart.

In 2014, my investment policy was modified to buy stocks of good companies and hold them for the long term. Chart 6 shows the result of my stock investments (red line) compared to the Benchmark Index (blue line) and ETF investments (red dashed line). The unit value of $1.00 was calculated on December 31, 2013. Since then, the stock group clearly outperformed the Benchmark and ETFs.

Chart 6. Stock and ETF performances.

Risk Management of ETFs

Broad-market index ETFs are primarily protected against stock losses by the passive management of investment portfolios which mimic the composition and performace of reputable market indices.

ETFs are secondarily protected by rebalancing significant allocation errors as described in the SmallTrades Portfolio’s strategies for risk management. In theory, a significant drift of asset classes occurs when one asset class surpasses a 24-28% allocation error. My preferred allocation of ETF market values is 30% stocks, 30% REITs, 20% bonds, and 20% gold bullion.

A perfect allocation of ETFs would result in 0% allocation error.  Furthermore, allocation errors would reflect disproportional gains or losses of market value.  Chart 7 shows the year-end allocation errors (blue bars) and error limits (red dashed lines) of my ETFs. There was growth of the Global Stocks ETF and decline of the remaining ETFs. Any allocation error that exceeds an error limit (red dashed line) should trigger trades that rebalance the ETFs to the preferred allocation.  My ETFs were not rebalanced in 2017.

Chart 7. ETF allocation errors in 2017.

Risk management of Stocks

My stocks are primarily protected against risks of steep loss by diversification of the market sectors, as illustrated in the preceding chart 3. The second line of defense is stop-loss orders.  In keeping with the investment goal of holding good stocks for the long run, I set ‘stops’ at a wide margin to prevent recent market fluctuations from triggering an unwanted sale.

Plan

The SmallTades Portfolio will continue to be actively managed for long term success. The ETFs will be rebalanced anytime there’s a 24% allocation error or a modification of the ETF holdings. In 2017, I failed to sell large cap stocks in order to buy good small cap and mid cap stocks. Consequently, 60% of the total market capitalization of my stock portfolio was in the Large Cap category.  In 2018, I would like to reduce the Large Cap category to 40% total market capitalization and boost the market capitalization of small- and mid cap stocks issued by good companies with potential growth of earnings.

Portfolio history

  1. On 12/31/2007, the portfolio held a group of actively managed mutual funds in a tax-deferred Roth account. Since then there have been no cash deposits or withdrawals and the portfolio still resides in a Roth account.
  2. During 2007-2010 the actively managed mutual funds were traded for stocks in an attempt to earn a 30% annual return by process of turning over short term ‘winners’.  Four mistakes led to a big loss:
  3. mistake #1: after a couple of short term capital gains from Lehman Brothers Inc., I ignored the dangers of the company’s large debt and lost $45,000 during Lehman’s decline to bankruptcy.
  4. mistake #2: substantial long term profits from good companies were lost by selling holdings for short term profits. My strategy was to earn a quick 30% in the first year and re-invest in the next winners. It was too difficult to identify the next winners.
  5. mistake #3: day-trading was a game of chance that I played and managed to break even; meanwhile, good stocks grew in value.
  6. mistake #4: a trial of investing in leveraged ETFs resulted in losses due to negative compounding.
  7. I abandoned the goal of a 30% annual return in 2012 by adopting a more realistic, but still aggressive, goal of outperforming the benchmark. That same year, I changed my investment strategy to that of holding a mixed portfolio of 80% broad-market index ETFs and 20% stocks for the long term. ‘Good’ companies attract and retain investors for many years. I will search for profitable companies with growth potential that are undervalued by the stock market. My search methods include reading reputable sources of business news, partiicipating in an investment club, using stock screeners, and attending investor conferences. Then I include and exclude stocks by reading analyst reports, financial statments, SEC filings, and market analyses. Valuation critieria help me decide if the stock price is worth paying.
  8. Prior to March, 2016, five ETFs were allocated to four asset classes with each asset class holding 25% of the combined market value. Since my retirement income didn’t depend on making withdrawals from the SmallTrades Portfolio, I increased my ETF exposures to global stocks and REITs by decreasing my exposures to investment-grade bonds and gold bullion. The new allocation rule was 30% stocks, 30% REITs, 20% bonds, and 20% gold. Any drift in allocation to a 24% error will be rebalanced.
Advertisements

What is a good company?

December 15, 2017

Good companies attract investors.  They do so by selling a desirable product that sustains the company’s growth of sales and earnings.  The growth of sales is a good measure of market success.  Durable companies convert their sales invoices into cash and use the cash wisely.  Accounting items such as the free cash flow, sustainable growth rate, quick ratio, and debt-to-equity ratio are easy measures of the company’s health and durability.  Growth stocks should be assessed by the quality of the company.


Pictures from financial statements

July 4, 2017

These 20 graphs form a pictorial essay of  a company’s financial statements.  This large company survived the Recession of 2007-8!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2017 Douglas R. Knight


PE, PEG, and PEGY Valuation Ratios

June 19, 2017

The stock market lists several thousand stocks which have a variety of prices in relation to company profits. Company managers decide how they will use the profits to either pay dividends to shareholders or retain the earnings to build shareholders’ equity (ref. 1). The retained earnings may be used in ways that ultimately raise or lower the market price of the stock. Consequently, bankers and brokers pay attention to quarterly reports of the company profits measured as earnings per share (EPS).

Investors want to know whether the stock is priced too high (“overvalued”) or too low (“undervalued”) compared to the EPS. Professional analysts assist investors by preparing the PE, PEG, and PEGY valuation ratios.

  • PE standardizes the market value of a stock for ease of comparison with other stocks.
  • PEG refines the valuation of stocks by adjusting PE to the growth rate of company earnings. PE is in equilibrium with the growth of earnings at PEG = 1.
  • PEGY adjusts PEG to stocks with high yields of dividends.

PE

PE is the ratio of stock price (P) to company earnings (E). Formula 1 is used to calculate the PE (ref. 1,2):

PE = P / E,          formula 1

P is the price per share and E is the EPS accumulated over a 12-month period. For more information, please see notes at the end of this article.

example: if one share of stock is priced at $50 and the company’s annual EPS is $5, then 50/5 equals 10/1. The PE is 10.

The timing of company earnings determines whether the PE is labeled as “trailing” or “forward”.
Trailing PE is the current price per share divided by the EPS accumulated from the past 12 months or past 4 quarters. Trailing PE is based on known quantities.  Forward PE is the current price divided by the accumulated EPS expected for the next 12 months or next 4 quarters. Forward PE is an uncertain forecast of future market value based on the management’s or analyst’s expectation the EPS for the next 12 months.

PE represents the market value of all shareholders’ claims to $1 of annual EPS, past or future. The market value is judged to be high (“overvalued”) or low (“undervalued”) compared to an arbitrary estimation of fair value. There are several ways of determining a fair value.

  • Compare the stock’s PE to an average PE of the industry, market, or historical record (ref. 3).
  • Normalize the PE to the company’s rate of earnings growth, which generates the PEG ratio. By convention, the PE is fairly valued when PEG = 1 (ref 5,6).
  • The least practical method is a comparison to some theoretical PE that is not readily available to most investors (ref 1,4).

PEG

PEG is the ratio of PE to G (ref. 1,7,8; formula 2):

PEG = PE / G,          formula 2

G is the compound annual growth rate of EPS over a time period of 3-5 years, perhaps even longer in special cases. For more information, please see endnotes.

example: if one share of stock is priced at $50 with an annual EPS of $5 and a 10% compound annual growth rate of EPS, then 50/5/10 equals 1.00. The PEG is 1.00.

PEG measures the market value of a stock relative to the company’s rate of earnings growth (ref. 7,8). The theoretical equilibrium between market value and the rate of EPS growth occurs at PEG = 1.0. PEGs below 1.0 suggest undervaluation and those above 1.0 suggest overvaluation (ref. 9).

Trailing- and Forward PEGs represent the stock’s market value relative to past and future eras (ref. 7,8). Trailing PEG is a factual measurement of market value provided that the EPS was measured during the past year and the EPS growth rate occurred during the past several years. Forward PEG is an uncertain prediction of market value based on the company’s expected earnings for next year and an analyst’s forecast of earnings growth for the next several years.

examples: when the forward PEG is above 1.0, the market expectation of growth exceeds consensus estimates and the stock is overvalued (ref. 8). If PEG is below 1.0, the stock is undervalued (ref. 2,7).

Limitations of PEG (ref. 3,8):

  • The EPS growth forecast may be invalid.
  • Another variable besides PEG could add or subtract value to the investment. For example, PEG ignores the value of a cash-rich company.
  • An overvalued company, for example one with a PEG of 3.0, might still be a stable investment despite its low rate of earnings growth.
  • PEG is best suited for stocks that don’t pay dividends; otherwise, calculate the PEGY.

PEGY

Some investors prefer high-yield ‘value’ stocks rather than low-yield ‘growth’ stocks. High yield stocks typically pay higher dividends at lower EPS growth rates (e.g., the stocks of utility companies). PEGY includes dividends in its valuation ratio for high-yield stocks (ref. 8; formula 3).

PEGY = PE / (G+Y),          formula 3

Y is the stock’s dividend yield. Dividend yield is the ratio of the annual dividend per share to the price per share.

example: if one share of stock is priced at $50, the annual EPS is $5, the compound annual growth rate of EPS is 8%, and the dividend yield is 5%, then what are PEG and PEGY?
PEG = 50/5/8 = 1.25. PE is overvalued if the high dividend is excluded.
PEGY = 50/5/(8+5) = 0.77. PE is undervalued if the high dividend is included.

Payback period

Besides measuring market value, the PE and PEG also predict the stock’s payback period. A payback period is the amount of time needed for the accumulation of company earnings to match the original amount of investment. If all accumulated earnings were paid to investors, which is unlikely, the payout would provide a 100% return. Longer payback periods represent riskier investments, especially when the company is still establishing its market position or competing with innovative companies (ref. 9,10,11).

The PE ratio also represents a payback period measured in years.

example: if a stock is priced at $50 per share and the EPS is $5 per share every year, then $50/share divided by $5/share/year equals the payback period of 10 years. The same units of $/share cancel each other in the numerator and denominator.

The PE payback period is the time needed for an accumulated EPS to equal the original share price, assuming the EPS remains constant during the accumulation period. Most companies don’t repeat the same EPS every year.

The PEG payback period accounts for the desired phenomenon of EPS growth. The PEG payback period is the number of years that the growth of earnings accumulates enough value to match the original investment (ref. 9,10).

example: if a stock is priced at $50 per share, the EPS is $5 per share, and the EPS growth rate is 10%, it would take 7 years for the EPS to accumulate a value of the original stock price of $50. The PEG payback (7 years) is earlier than the PE payback (10 years) due to the 10% rate of earnings growth.

Conclusions

Company earnings are a strong determinant of stock value. PE, PEG, and PEGY ratios represent the stock market’s valuation of company earnings. Don’t rely solely on company earnings to judge the investment value of stocks. Also assess the business performance and company value (ref. 2,6).

Endnotes

Formula 1: PE = P / E

  • P is the current auction price for a share of common stock listed in the stock market. The auction price fluctuates often depending on when a trading order is filled at an agreeable price between buyer and seller. Analysts typically use the closing price of the latest trading day to calculate the PE.
  • E is one year’s accumulation of the company’s earnings per share of common stock [EPS]. EPS represents the company’s net income divided by its outstanding shares and fluctuates at quarterly intervals. Any guaranteed payments of dividends to shares of preferred stock automatically reduce the EPS before calculation of the PE. EPS depends on the analyst’s choice between GAAP- and non-GAAP earnings and choice between basic and diluted outstanding shares.

Formula 2: PEG = PE / G

  • PEG fluctuates with frequent changes of PE and infrequent changes of G.
  • G is the EPS growth rate, which is the compound annual growth rate of EPS for a time period of at least several years. Although G is measured as a percentage change of EPS per year, the common practice is to ignore the units of measurement when calculating PEG.
  • Trailing PEG is the trailing PE divided by the G for past earnings.
  • Forward PEG is the forward PE divided by the G for future earnings.

REFERENCES

1. How to Find P/E and PEG Ratios, by Thomas Smith, Investopedia LLC. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/fundamental-analysis/09/price-to-earnings-and-growth-ratios.asp?lgl=v-table
2. How to use the PE Ratio and PEG to tell a stock’s future, by the Investopedia Staff, updated March 17, 2016. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/00/092200.asp
3. What is the PEG Ratio? https://www.fool.com/knowledge-center/peg-ratio.aspx
4. Aswath Damodaran, Intrinsic Valuation in a Relative Value World. http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/country/relvalFMA.pdf .
5. PEG Ratio; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. pages 6-7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PEG_ratio
6. How useful is the PEG Ratio? Joseph Khattab, April 6, 2006. The Motley Fool. https://www.fool.com/investing/value/2006/04/06/how-useful-is-the-peg-ratio.aspx
7. Price/Earnings to Growth- PEG Ratio. Investopedia LLC. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pegratio.asp
8. PEG Ratios Nail Down Value Stocks, by Ryan Barnes, 11/24/2015. Investopedia LLC. http://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/043002.asp?lgl=v-table
9. Double your dollars. Selena Maranjian, September 7, 2010. The Motley Fool. https://www.fool.com/investing/value/2010/09/07/double-your-dollars.aspx
10. Payback period = double your money. Course 304: PEG and Payback Periods. Morningstar, 2015. http://news.morningstar.com/classroom2/course.asp?docId=3066&page=2&CN=C
11. The longer the payback period, the greater the risk. Course 304: PEG and Payback Periods. Morningstar, 2015. http://news.morningstar.com/classroom2/course.asp?docId=3066&page=3&CN=C

Copyright © 2017 Douglas R. Knight


Stop losing value from a declining price

March 4, 2017

background

The market value of your stock equals your principal (i.e., the amount you invested) plus any profit or loss from price fluctuation. The market price that moves below what you paid to purchase the stock will produce a loss of principal if you sell the investment. Here are several risk factors that may drive stock prices downward:

  1. Company performance. ‘Good’ companies attract investors. Conversely, ‘distressed’ companies repel investors.
  2. Industry performance. Business cycles can affect the sales of products from an entire industry. For example, sales of new automobiles declined during the Recession of 2008.
  3. Market cycles. Aside from business performance, the entire stock market is subject to periods of declining prices due to massive selloffs by investors.

The risk of an extreme loss can be prevented by setting a stop-loss price (“stop”) to sell part or all of your shares.

ways of setting the stop

The systematic way is quite simple. If the market value is below your invested principal, then select an absolute loss or a fraction of the principal. Examples:

  1. Absolute loss. Suppose you invest $5,000 in 100 shares of stock (i.e., $50/share) and you can tolerate a loss of $1,000 should the price start to fall. Regardless of future prices, you choose to stop the decline at $1,000 below the original $5,000 value. In this example, the stop would be $40/share [stop = (value – loss)/shares = ($5,000 – $1,000)/100].
  2. Fraction of value. Suppose you can tolerate a 10% loss from an investment originally valued at $5,000 for 100 shares.  Ten percent is one-tenth of 100, which is equivalent to a decimal number of 0.10. The stop would be $45/share [stop = (1.00 – decimal)*value/shares = (1.00 – 0.10)*$5,000/100].

The technical way is based on the stock’s historical prices. If you want to minimize the chance of a sale, set the stop at the lowest price from the past 5-10 years. Beware that setting the stop at a historical low may incur a steep loss. Other ways involve the more complicated analyses of trendlines, moving-average lines, or price statistics.

Another way is to adjust the price gap (gap = market price – stop) to the growth of capital gains. As the market price increases over time, choose a narrow gap to protect the capital gain or a wide gap to reduce the chance of a trade. Generally speaking, widening the price gap will reduce the chance of a trade at the risk of incurring a bigger loss.

add a limit price (“limit”) for extra protection

A brokerage firm will enforce your stop order for 30-90 days depending on the firm’s trading platform. The firm’s computer activates the order when the latest market price reaches the stop. The order is then filled at the next available price. In a chaotic market, the price could plunge below your stop to an exceptionally low value at the next available trade, resulting in a bigger loss than you planned. You might be able to prevent this result by setting a limit slightly below the stop. The trading order would be filled somewhere within the stop-limit price zone unless the transaction is cancelled, unfilled, when the next available price dips below the limit. The limit helps protect the extent of your loss.

who should worry about an extreme loss?

Nobody’s immune, but long-time investors have the least concern. Investment strategies such as dollar-cost-averaging and automatic-dividend-reinvestment plans will help protect against damages from periodic bear markets. Short- and intermediate-time investors are at greater risk for incurring an extreme loss from market down-cycles. For example, families who are saving to pay college fees or to buy a home risk big losses from a bear market.

conclusion

Stop orders are used to set the price for buying or selling exchange-traded products such as stocks, ETFs, and REITs. This article discussed the use of a stop-limit order to sell a stock in a declining market. Brokerage firms may restrict the duration of stop-limit orders to 30-90 days after which the order is cancelled without a transaction until you renew the order. Periodic renewals allow you to reconsider your strategy in light of the prevailing price trend. In a downtrend, simply renew the order. In an uptrend, you may wish to protect a growing profit by resetting the stop-limit order to higher prices. Click on this link to skimming a profit for another perspective on protecting a growing profit.

Copyright © 2017 Douglas R. Knight


Skim the profit?

February 7, 2017

Selling all or part of a profitable investment is a tough choice to make.  On one hand, holding the investment allows time to accumulate a high return, but at the risk of losing profit in the market’s next big decline. On the other hand, selling portions of the investment to ensure a profit today will diminish the future return.

Both choices are easy to illustrate by imagining a stock investment that pays no dividends.  Assume there is a consistent growth of stock price and that no additional shares are purchased after the original purchase. The profit is skimmed by selling part of the investment when its market value grows to twice the original purchase.  Repeat the process every time the market value doubles until the investment is closed.  Chart 1 illustrates the skimming of a $1,000 investment.

chart 1, Market values.  $1,000 was invested in a good growth stock that paid no dividends. A generous 15% annual return doubled the market value every 5 years. The HOLD strategy (black squares) was to avoid selling for 20 years. The SELL strategy (green circles) was to sell half the shares every time the market value doubled. There were no trading fees.

After 5 years, the investor could claim a profit of $1,000 on the original $1,000 investment. Then the choices would be to close the investment at $2,000, withdraw only the $1,000 profit and wait for more (green circles), or withdraw nothing and wait for a bigger profit (black squares). The largest profit is made by waiting 20 years.

Chart 2 illustrates the accumulated cash balances of the HOLD and SELL strategies.

chart 2. The cash balances of the strategies in chart 1 are illustrated in this chart using the same symbols for data points. After 20 years, all remaining shares are sold for cash. The end point of each graph is the final cash balance.

chart 2, Cash balances. The cash balances of both strategies in chart 1 are illustrated in this chart using the same symbols for data points. The proceeds from every sale were held in a cash account and allowed to accumulate for 20 years.  After 20 years, the remaining shares were sold for cash. The end point of each strategy is the final cash balance.

After closing the investment in 20 years, the accumulated cash balance would be $16,367 from the HOLD strategy and $5,045 from the SELL strategy.

Alternate conditions

The accumulated cash balance will vary according to the annual rate of return (appended chart 3), the amount skimmed (appended chart 4), and the payment of dividends (appended chart 5).  In every condition, the total profit of the HOLD strategy exceeds the total profit of the SELL strategy.

Conclusion

On the question of whether or not to skim profits, skim if you need cash in the next 5-10 years. Otherwise, don’t sell without reassessing the investment or using a risk management scheme.  The question of selling for a loss was excluded from this discussion; that’s a different topic.

Appendix: Tables of cash balances

Charts 3-5 are tables of cash balances that represent profits from an imaginary investment of $1,000. The choices for taking a profit were to HOLD the investment for 20 years before liquidating the account or to SELL profitable portions of the investment.  Assume there were no trading fees.

Chart 3 shows that a 15% annual rate of return earned a bigger profit than a 7% annual rate of return.  Furthermore, the HOLD strategy earned a larger profit than the SELL strategy at both rates of return.

chart 3.

chart 3, Rate of return.  $1,000 was invested in a good growth stock that paid no dividends. No shares were purchased after the original investment. The 20-year cash balance (cells) was only affected by the annual rate of return (rows) and liquidation strategy (columns).  The HOLD strategy did not sell shares for 20 years.  The SELL strategy sold half the shares whenever the market value doubled in size during the 20 year period.  The 7% rate permitted 1 selling period and the 15% rate permitted 4 selling periods. 

Chart 4 illustrates the effect of skimming 50%, 100%, or 150% increments of market value.

chart 4.

chart 4, Increments of market value. $1,000 was invested in a good growth stock that paid no dividends. The investment’s annual rate of return was 15% and no shares were purchased after the original purchase. The cash balances (cells) accumulated every time period (rows) among 3 different increments of market value (columns). The HOLD strategy did not sell shares for 20 years. The ‘rule’ for the SELL strategy was to sell a portion of shares when the market value grew by approximately 50% every 3 years ($521), 100% every 5 years ($1,011), or 150% every 7 years ($1,660).

The HOLD strategy outperformed the SELL strategy. With the SELL strategy, waiting longer to skim bigger profits accumulated a larger cash balance after 20 years. Why? The bigger profits were less frequent, which had the effect of preserving the investment’s principal for longer time periods.

Chart 5 reveals a surprising effect for skimming profits from reinvested dividends.

chart 5.

chart 5, Dividends. $1,000 was invested in a good growth stock that paid a 2% dividend on every share. No shares were purchased after the original investment unless the dividends were automatically reinvested. The cash balances (cells) accumulated with the passage of  time (rows) among 3 types of investments (columns). The HOLD strategy did not sell shares for 20 years. The SELL strategy removed half the remaining shares every 5 years.

There were no surprises in the HOLD strategy. Reinvested dividends accumulated the largest cash balance over 20 years. However, reinvested dividends accumulated the lowest cash balances in the SELL strategy. Why? Slightly more shares were sold every 5 years from ‘reinvested dividends’ compared to ‘no dividends’. Yet the same number of shares were sold from ‘cash dividends’ compared to ‘no dividends’. The cash dividends directly augmented the cash balances.

Copyright © 2017 Douglas R. Knight


R-squared, the linearity of investment returns.

December 24, 2016

[updated 12/25/2016: R2 is a useful measure of indexing]

The R-squared (R2) statistic describes a pattern of plotted data with respect to a straight line. R-squared is called the coefficient of determination (ref 1,2).

random

The black dots in figure 1 represent investment returns that are poorly related to market returns. There is a random distribution of investment returns with respect to market returns. The blue line is an inadequate representation of the relationship simply because there is no relationship. The R2 score for this distribution is 0.03. Conversely, the black dots in figure 2 show the ‘herding’ of data around a straight line.

ordered

Figure 2’s investment returns are highly related to market returns with an R2 of 0.997.

Significance

The R2 score represents the degree of alignment of data to a best-fit line as determined by regression analysis. The lowest possible score of 0 indicates a random pattern of data with absolutely no alignment. The highest possible score of 1 represents complete alignment.

The product of R2 X 100 represents the percent of variation in investment returns that are related to market returns (ref 1,2). In other words, R2 measures the relavance of the best-fit line to a set of data. Relavance increases as the R2 score varies from 0 to 1.

The lowest score of 0 defies any financial analyst to draw a meaningful line for investment returns as they relate to market returns. In figure 1, the incline (β) and Y-intercept (⍺) of the blue line are unreliable measurements of investment performance.

The highest R2 score of 1.00 identifies a straight line of near-perfect predictions of returns. Any R2 above 0.75 identifies a straight line for making predictions of returns. Lower scores represent increasingly random events. In figure 2, the incline (β) and Y-intercept (⍺) are reliable measurements of investment performance.

R-squared is an excellent measure of index fund performance.  Websites for index mutual funds and ETFs publish R2 as a measure of alignment between fund returns and the market index.   Funds that have an R2 score of nearly 1.00 track the index very closely.

References

1.  Lain Pardoe, Laura Simon, and Derek Young. STAT 501, Regression Methods. 1.5- The coefficient of determination, r-squared. Pennsylvania State University, Eberly College of Science, Online courses. https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat501
2.  R-squared. 2016, Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/r-squared.asp?lgl=no-infinite


%d bloggers like this: